Elsevier

Physical Therapy in Sport

Volume 25, May 2017, Pages 47-54
Physical Therapy in Sport

Original Research
The effects of a combined static-dynamic stretching protocol on athletic performance in elite Gaelic footballers: A randomised controlled crossover trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.11.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Negative effects of static stretching on performance are well known.

  • Static stretching may help prevent muscle injuries in running and sprinting activities.

  • Dynamic stretching can nullify the performance deficits caused by static stretching.

  • This is significant for program design, prescription and sequencing of exercises within a warm-up.

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the effect of three different static-dynamic stretching protocols on sprint and jump performance in Gaelic footballers.

Design

Double-blind, controlled, crossover trial.

Setting

Sports Institute research environment.

Participants

Seventeen male elite level Gaelic footballers, aged 18–30 years, completed three stretching protocols.

Main Outcome Measures

Athletic performance was measured by countermovement jump height and power, and timed 10 m, 20 m, and 40 m sprints.

Results

Static stretching reduced sprint speed by 1.1% over 40 m and 1.0% over 20 m. Static stretching also reduced countermovement jump height by 10.6% and jump power by 6.4%. When static stretching was followed by dynamic stretching, sprint speed improved by 1.0% over 20 m and 0.7% over 40 m (p < 0.05). The static - dynamic stretching protocol also improved countermovement jump height by 8.7% (p < 0.01) and power by 6.7% (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Static stretching reduces sprint speed and jump performance. Static stretching should be followed by dynamic stretching during warm-up to nullify any performance deficits caused by static stretching.

Introduction

Gaelic Football is Ireland's national sport (McIntyre, 2005, Strudwick et al., 2002). The sport places a high demand on the aerobic system and other components of fitness including strength, agility, sprint endurance, flexibility and speed (McIntyre, 2005). Gaelic footballers carry out a large number of accelerations, decelerations, jumps and changes of direction in a 60–70 min game (O'Donoghue & King 2004). Muscle-tendon unit injuries account for 51.8% of all injuries in elite level Gaelic football (Murphy, O’Malley, Gissane, & Blake, 2012).

Athletes carry out pre-participation warm ups to prepare for the demands of the sport (Bishop & Middleton, 2013) and a well-designed warm-up can bring about physiological changes to optimise performance (Swanson, 2006). Traditionally warm-ups have consisted of a sub-maximal aerobic component followed by static stretching (Bishop, 2003) and a segment of skill rehearsal in which the athletes perform dynamic movements similar to those of the sport or event (Young, 2007). The aim of the sub-maximal aerobic component was to raise the body temperature. This increase in temperature has been found to increase nerve conduction velocity and increase muscle-tendon unit compliance (Bishop, 2003).

Static stretching has been shown to be an effective way of improving ROM (Bandy et al., 1997, Paradisis et al., 2014, Power et al., 2004, McHugh and Cosgrave, 2010). Static stretching has been traditionally part of sports warm-ups to help prevent injury (Ekstrand et al., 1983, Hadala and Barrios, 2009, Smith, 1994), reduce subsequent muscle soreness (High, Howley, & Franks, 1989) and improve performance (Beaulieu, 1981, Shellock and Prentice, 1985, Stamford, 1984, Young, 2007, Young and Behm, 2003).

A review by McHugh and Cosgrave (2010) concluded that there was evidence that pre-participation stretching reduces the incidence of muscle strains. More recently a comprehensive review by Behm, Blazevich, Kay, and McHugh (2016), supported this point and concluded that static stretching shows no overall effect on all-cause injury or overuse injuries, but there may be a benefit in reducing acute muscle injuries in movements with repetitive contractions such as running and sprinting.

Various studies have found that static stretching may impair performance (Behm and Kibele, 2007, Behm et al., 2006, Nelson et al., 2001). A review by Shrier (2004) investigating the effect of stretching on performance found that 23 out of 24 studies reviewed reported that acute stretching reduced performances of force, torque production and jumping. Subsequent reviews by McHugh and Cosgrave, 2010, Behm and Chaouachi, 2011, Kay and Blazevich, 2012, Simic et al., 2012 have also concluded that static stretching may have a negative effect on many aspects of sports performance. The European College of Sport Sciences published a position statement (Magnusson & Renstrom, 2006), which concluded that there was firm evidence that an acute bout of stretching could diminish performance in tests requiring maximal muscle efforts.

Many theories have been hypothesized why acute muscle stretching may negatively affect performance, such as reducing tendon stiffness, forcing the muscle to work at shorter and weaker lengths (Fowles et al., 2000, Nelson et al., 2001, Weir et al., 2005; Cramer, Housh, Weir & Johnson, 2005). However Behm et al. (2016) suggested changes in muscle length are unlikely to be an important mechanism influencing the force reduction after static stretching.

Changes in tendon stiffness has also been reported to influence electromechanical delay (Cresswell et al., 1995, Waugh et al., 2013, Waugh et al., 2014) and therefore reduce the rate of force production. Reductions in tendon stiffness are also thought to affect the rate of force development (Bojsen-Møller et al., 2005, Waugh et al., 2013). Brooks, Zerba, and Faulkner (1995) proposed mechanical stretch imposed on the muscle–tendon unit could cause damage within the muscle itself, thus reducing contractile force capacity. No studies have been able to demonstrate muscle damage following static stretching (Behm et al., 2016). The review by Behm et al. (2016) theorized that a reduction in central (efferent) drive following static stretching may also affect force production and that emotional arousal may positively stimulate the central nervous system and reduce the potential negative effect of static stretching on performance.

Many studies have also reported no reduction in strength, power, or explosive muscular performance following static stretching (Bazett-Jones et al., 2005, Burkett et al., 2005, Cramer et al., 2005, Unick et al., 2005). Some studies have even reported improvement in athletic performance following static stretching (O'Connor et al., 2006, Gonzalez-Rave et al., 2009, Haag et al., 2010).

A Cochrane review of 12 studies by Herbert, de Noronha, and Kamper (2011) found that the performance of static stretching before or after exercise did not lead to reduction in delayed-onset muscle soreness in healthy adults. Due to several studies (Behm and Kibele, 2007, Behm et al., 2006, Nelson et al., 2001) and a review (Shrier, 2004) reporting the negative effects of static stretching on sports performance the American College of Sports Medicine's guidelines (ACSM 2010) suggested static stretching be removed as part of a warm-up routine and to only include cardiovascular work when strength or power was important to performance.

Despite the lack of definitive evidence on the effect of static stretching on injury prevention, its lack of effectiveness in the prevention of muscle soreness and its detrimental effect on performance, static stretching continues to be a component to many warm-ups (Behm et al., 2016).

In more recent years there has been a shift away from static stretching and dynamic stretching has become a popular component to sporting warm ups (Behm et al., 2016). Dynamic stretching has been demonstrated in various studies to reduce injury (Arnason et al., 2008, Manoel et al., 2008, Soligard et al., 2008) and improve subsequent athletic performance (Holt and Lambourne, 2008, Nelson and Kokkonen, 2001, Yamaguchi et al., 2008). Hough, Ross, and Howatson (2009) and Torres et al. (2008) have suggested the performance enhancement may be to post-activation potentiation in the stretched muscle caused by voluntary contractions of the antagonist muscle. Post-activation potentiation is the phenomenon by which the contractile history of muscles directly affects their subsequent rate of force development (RFD) or the ability to generate force in a rapid manner (Hodgson, Docherty, & Robbins, 2005).

Dynamic stretching can elevate core temperature (Fletcher & Jones, 2004). Elevated core temperature could then increase nerve conduction velocity, muscle-tendon unit compliance and enzymatic cycling, accelerating energy production (Bishop, 2003). Dynamic stretching has also been suggested by some authors to increase central drive (Guissard & Duchateau, 2006). Murphy, Di Santo, Alkanani, and Behm (2010) demonstrated the ROM gains achieved with static stretching are maintained when dynamic activities are performed after the static stretching. Samson, Button, Chaouachi, and Behm (2012) found static stretching following a submaximal warm up to increase ROM more than dynamic stretching following a submaximal warm up.

The quality of evidence investigating the effect of stretching on athletic performance varies greatly. Most studies use a randomised crossover design. However some studies fail to employ tester-blinding (Sayers et al., 2008, Winchester et al., 2008, Beckett et al., 2009, Gelen, 2010). Young (2007) concluded that there were contradictory results regarding the effects of acute stretch, which could have resulted from major issues in research design. Issues identified by Young (2007) included a lack of control or reliability analysis and the long, practically irrelevant durations of the imposed stretches, which did not typically reflect stretching durations carried out in pre-participation warm-ups. The total duration of muscle stretching in most studies in this area was much longer than the ranges normally used in practice i.e., 15–30 s per muscle group (Rubini et al., 2007, Young, 2007).

One criticism of the design method employed by studies investigating combined stretching and performance is the sequencing of the stretching protocols. Some studies instructed their participants to perform dynamic stretching then static stretching (Fletcher and Anness, 2007, Gelen, 2010). In sport, stretching techniques can typically be done in the reverse order, static stretching then dynamic stretching followed by sports specific drills (Behm and Chaouachi, 2011, Behm et al., 2016, Young, 2007).

Several studies have demonstrated when dynamic stretching was performed prior to static stretching there was no negative effect on subsequent performance (Beckett et al., 2009, Fletcher and Anness, 2007, Wallman et al., 2008, Winchester et al., 2008). A thorough search of the literature failed to uncover any studies, of high quality investigating the effect of performing dynamic stretching after static stretching, as occurs in performance sport.

From the literature it is clear that static stretching has a detrimental effect on sprint and jump performance. High quality studies have demonstrated the performance enhancing effect of performing dynamic stretching before sprinting and jumping. Despite this evidence, many coaches and athletes continue to employ static stretching as part of modern field sport warm ups (Behm et al., 2016).

Simic et al. (2012) recommended that the usage of static stretching as the sole activity during warm-up routine should be avoided and that due to the potential positive effect of pre-exercise static stretching on the reduction of incidence of muscle strains, further studies should examine the acute effects of static stretching of shorter duration. (15–30 s). Simic et al. (2012) stated that static stretching of shorter duration should be incorporated into a comprehensive pre-exercise warm-up routine prior to maximal muscular performance.

The review by Behm et al. (2016) identified a lack of studies on stretch-induced performance changes that actually replicate modern sport pre-event preparation. Typical warm up practices carried out by coaches and athletes, combine submaximal warm ups, static and dynamic stretching with sport specific practice (Behm et al., 2016). The sequencing of these warm-up practices and their subsequent effect on performance must be investigated to inform sports practice.

Section snippets

Aims

To the author's knowledge, this study is the first controlled trial, investigating the effect of implementing dynamic exercise post static stretching on sprint and jump performance. Although the detrimental effect of static stretching on power performance measures and the positive effect of dynamic exercise on power output is well described in the extensive reviews (Behm and Chaouachi, 2011, Behm et al., 2016, Peck et al., 2014, Shrier, 2004, Simic et al., 2012) this is the first study to

Methods

This was a randomised controlled crossover trial comparing three stretching protocols. Testing took place on nine occasions over a period of 16 days. Participants rested the day before testing and maintained consistent nutrition and hydration plans 48 h prior to testing. Testing took place at the same time on the same day over a three-week period. A physiotherapist, who was blinded to the performance measures and the aim of the study, oversaw all warm up exercises and stretches.

Results

In total 30 GAA players volunteered for the study. Six volunteers were excluded; two were excluded because they were suffering from a musculoskeletal injury, which may have been aggravated by participating in the study. Four other volunteers were excluded, as their playing history did not deem them to be of an elite level as described in the inclusion criteria.

Seven players were lost to the study due to illness or injury sustained while competing with their respective club sides.

Seventeen

Discussion

In this current study the static stretching protocol appeared to a have significant detrimental effect on the power output in each of the performance measures. The implementation of a dynamic warm up post-static stretching appears to have a significant benefit on performance in each of the performance measures (Table 2).

In the speed tests, sprint performance was reduced by 0.02 s (1.1%) over 10 m, 0.04 s (1.0%) over 20 m and 0.06 s (1.1%) over 40 m post static stretching. (Fig. 2). These

Conclusion

To prevent any potential performance detriment, static stretching should not be carried out directly prior to any strength, high speed, explosive or reactive activities. Static stretching may be carried out at the beginning of the warm up before the dynamic and/or sports specific practice drills. Athletes can however, include static stretching in their overall fitness program or at the beginning of a pre-event warm up for the general health, muscle strain injury prevention and functional

Ethical approval

This study was granted ethics approval by the Ulster University Ethics and Filter Committee, School of Health Sciences.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Funding

None declared.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank The Sports Institute of Northern Ireland for use of their staff, equipment and facilities in the data collection process and also The Ulster University GAA academy for assisting with participant recruitment and data collection. A special thanks in particular is expressed to Dr Richard McCann and Michael Johnson for their time and expertise with the data collection.

References (75)

  • M. Alter

    Science of flexibility (2004) champaign Illinois human kinetics

    (2004)
  • American College of Sports Medicine

    ACSM's resource manual for guidelines for exercise testing and prescription

    (2010)
  • A. Arnason et al.

    Prevention of hamstring strains in elite soccer: An intervention study Scandinavian

    Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

    (2008)
  • W.D. Bandy et al.

    The effect of time and frequency of static stretching on flexibility of the hamstring muscles

    Physical Therapy

    (1997)
  • M. Barr et al.

    Which measure of drop jump performance best predicts sprinting speed?

    The Journal of Strength & Conditioning

    (2011)
  • D.M. Bazett-Jones et al.

    Effect of potentiation and stretching on maximal force, rate of force development, and range of motion

    Journal of Strength Conditioning Research

    (2005)
  • J.E. Beaulieu

    Developing a stretching program

    Physical Sports Medicine

    (1981)
  • J.R. Beckett et al.

    Effects of static stretching on repeated sprint and change of direction performance

    Journal of medicine & science in sports & exercise

    (2009)
  • D.G. Behm et al.

    Acute effects of stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: A systematic review

    Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism

    (2016)
  • D.G. Behm et al.

    Flexibility is not related to stretch-induced deficits in force or power

    Journal of Sports Science and Medicine

    (2006)
  • D.G. Behm et al.

    A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance

    European Journal of Applied Physiology

    (2011)
  • D.G. Behm et al.

    Effects of differing intensities of static stretching on jump performance

    European Journal of Applied Physiology

    (2007)
  • D. Bishop

    Warm up I: Potential mechanisms and the effects of passive warm up on exercise performance

    Sports Medicine

    (2003)
  • D. Bishop et al.

    Effects of stat stretching following a dynamic warm-up on speed, agility and power

    Journal of Human Sport and Exercise

    (2013)
  • J. Bojsen-Møller et al.

    Muscle performance during maximal isometric and dynamic contractions is influenced by the stiffness of the tendinous structures

    Journal of Applied Physiology

    (2005)
  • P.S. Bradley et al.

    The effect of static, ballistic and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on vertical jump performance

    Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

    (2007)
  • S.V. Brooks et al.

    Injury to muscle fibres after single stretches of passive and maximally stimulated muscles in mice

    Journal of Physiology

    (1995)
  • L.N. Burkett et al.

    The best warm-up for the vertical jump in college-age athletic men

    Journal of Strength Conditioning Research

    (2005)
  • A. Chaouachi et al.

    Stretch and sprint training reduces stretch-induced sprint performance deficits in 13-15 year old youth

    European Journal of Applied Physiology

    (2008)
  • J.T. Cramer et al.

    The acute effects of static stretching on peak torque, mean power output, electromyography, and mechanomyography

    European Journal of Applied Physiology

    (2005)
  • A.G. Cresswell et al.

    Influence of gastrocnemius-muscle length on triceps surae torque development and elec- tromyographic activity in man

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1995)
  • J. Ekstrand et al.

    Prevention of soccer injuries. Supervision by doctor and physiotherapist

    American Journal of Sports Medicine

    (1983)
  • I.M. Fletcher et al.

    The acute effects of combined static and dynamic stretch protocols on fifty-meter sprint performance in track and field athletes

    Journal of Strength and Conditioning research

    (2007)
  • I.M. Fletcher et al.

    The effect of different warm-up stretch protocols on 20 meter sprint performance in trained rugby union players

    Journal of Strength Conditioning Research

    (2004)
  • I.M. Fletcher et al.

    An investigation into the possible physiological mechanisms associated with changes in performance related to acute responses to different pre-activity stretch modalities

    Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism

    (2010)
  • J.R. Fowles et al.

    Reduced strength after passive stretch of the human plantarflexors

    Journal of Applied Physiology

    (2000)
  • E. Gelen

    Acute effects of different warm up methods on sprint, slalom dribbling, and penalty kick performance in soccer players

    Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

    (2010)
  • J.M. Gonzalez-Rave et al.

    Acute effects of heavy-load exercises, stretching exercises, and heavy-load plus stretching exercises on squat jump and countermovement jump performance

    Journal of Strength Conditioning Research

    (2009)
  • N. Guissard et al.

    Neural aspects of muscle stretching

    Exercise Sport Sciences Review

    (2006)
  • S.J. Haag et al.

    Effects of acute static stretching of the throwing shoulder on pitching performance of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III baseball players

    Journal of Strength Conditioning Research

    (2010)
  • M. Hadala et al.

    Different strategies for sports injury prevention in an America's Cup yachting crew

    Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise

    (2009)
  • R.D. Herbert et al.

    Stretching to prevent or reduce muscle soreness after exercise

    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

    (2011)
  • M. Hodgson et al.

    Post-activation potentiation: underlying physiology and implications for motor performance

    Sports Medicine

    (2005)
  • D.M. High et al.

    The effects of static stretching and warm-up on prevention of delayed-onset muscle soreness

    Research Quarterly Exercise and Sport

    (1989)
  • B.W. Holt et al.

    The impact of different warm-up protocols on vertical jump performance in male collegiate athletes

    Journal of Strength Conditioning Research

    (2008)
  • W.G. Hopkins

    Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science

    Sports Medicine

    (2000)
  • P.A. Hough et al.

    Effects of dynamic and static stretching on vertical jump performance and electromyographic activity

    Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

    (2009)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Effect of 16-week corrective training program on three dimensional joint moments of the dominant and non-dominant lower limbs during gait in children with genu varus deformity

      2020, Science and Sports
      Citation Excerpt :

      The stretching positions were those described by Alter [41]. Participants were instructed to hold a stretch just short of the point of discomfort for about 30 s [42]. For each muscle, the stretching was repeated four times with a rest interval of approximately 10 s [14].

    • Effect of manual therapy versus proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in dynamic balance, mobility and flexibility in field hockey players. A randomized controlled trial

      2018, Physical Therapy in Sport
      Citation Excerpt :

      We chose a PNF stretch which includes a contraction phase, thus avoiding the potential negative effects of static stretching, which reduces sprint speed. In this sense, (Loughran, Glasgow, Bleakley, & McVeigh, 2017)Loughran, M. et al. (2017) recommended that static stretching was followed by dynamic stretching during warmup, in order to nullify any performance deficit caused by it. With both treatments, we have achieved overall stability in both legs; however, only MT effects were sustained after four weeks.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text