Physical Therapy in Sport
Volume 9, Issue 3 , Pages 126-135, August 2008

Sonographic evaluation of the axillary artery during simulated overhead throwing arm positions

  • Claire Stapleton

      Affiliations

    • Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +441512314323; fax: +441512314353.
  • ,
  • Lee Herrington

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Rehabilitation and Human Performance Research, University of Salford, Salford, UK
  • ,
  • Keith George

      Affiliations

    • Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK

Received 19 February 2008; received in revised form 5 June 2008; accepted 12 June 2008.

Abstract 

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine changes in axillary artery diameter and peak systolic velocity in asymptomatic individuals during upper limb positioning commonly used to assess vascular pathology in athletes.

Design

Repeated measures observational study.

Setting

Physiology laboratory.

Participants

Subjective and objective screening excluded individuals with past, or present, conditions related to neurovascular compression syndromes. Thirty-one subjects (21 females, 10 males; mean age: 25±4 years) were included in the final analysis.

Main outcome measures

Sonographically determined axillary artery diameter and peak systolic velocity, as well as symptom production, were recorded for a series of 12 randomised arm positions, incorporating varying degrees of abduction, external rotation, and horizontal flexion/extension.

Results

The majority of arm positions revealed no change in artery diameter and peak systolic velocity. However, at the extreme of abduction, and arm positions incorporating 120° abduction, significant (p<0.0005) reductions in axillary artery diameter were noted. All mean results masked wide heterogeneity: 13% demonstrating a greater than 50% reduction in diameter, 10%, a doubling of peak systolic velocity, and 42%, reporting symptoms.

Conclusions

The number of individual clinically “positive” responses questions the specificity of individual diagnostic tests, such as the hyperabduction manoeuvre, and highlights the need to interpret test results in conjunction with the subjective assessment and other physical findings from the objective assessment.

Keywords: Ultrasonography, Diagnosis, Physical examination, Axillary artery

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1466-853X(08)00070-9

doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2008.06.009

Physical Therapy in Sport
Volume 9, Issue 3 , Pages 126-135, August 2008