The effects of walking, running, and shoe size on foot volumetrics

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1466-853X(03)00031-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of walking and running on foot volumetrics, and its relationship between measured foot size and preferred shoe size.

Design. This study was a single-group, repeated measures design. Twenty-eight physical therapy students participated in the testing.

Methods. Following 10 min of supine rest, a pre-exercise volumetric measurement of the right leg was obtained. Shoe size and foot length measurements were taken. Subjects were randomly assigned to a treatment condition (walking or running). The treadmill speed was set at a comfortable pace for each participant during exercise. Foot volume measurements were taken after the exercise. Subjects returned the next week to participate in the second condition.

Results. Paired t-tests were used to compare differences in outcome variables. Significant increases in fluid volumes were noted within groups after walking (2%) and running (3%) and between groups in the post-walk and post-run values (1.7%). A weak positive correlation was noted between changes in volume during running and the measured difference between foot size and shoe size (r=0.39; p=0.038).

Conclusions. Treadmill running for 10 min may lead to significantly greater foot volume compared to treadmill walking for the same period. Results also demonstrate that the greater the measured difference between shoe size and foot size, the greater the foot volume after running.

Introduction

Health care practitioners commonly prescribe and or recommend aerobic type activities for those patients seeking to improve their cardiovascular fitness. These aerobic activities often include walking or running programs. It has been demonstrated, however, that weight bearing activities such as walking or running can lead to foot and ankle swelling (Stick et al., 1992, Chalk et al., 1995, Cloughley and Mawdsley, 1995). A common complication resulting from weight bearing activities and which can lead to more serious foot problems is oedema (Evanski, 1982, Shereff, 1987, Stick et al., 1992, Gordon and Cuttic, 1994, Cloughley and Mawdsley, 1995).

Evidence exists demonstrating increases in interstitial and intracellular volume during and after exercise, especially as it relates to workload (Jacobbsson and Kjellmer, 1964, Lundvall et al., 1972, Baker and David, 1974, Schnizer et al., 1979, Stegall, 1966, McGough and Zurwasky, 1991, Stick et al., 1985; McGough & Zurwasky 1991). In particular, running and jogging have been shown to increase foot and ankle volume (Stick et al., 1992, Chalk et al., 1995, Cloughley and Mawdsley, 1995, Emby, 1997, Lazzarini et al., 1997). In the young or recreational athlete, the small changes which occur as a result of running would not be a problem. However, in the older adult or geriatric patient, these small increases in foot volume when added to the prior conditions of chronic resting oedema, fibrosis, joint stiffness, contractures, pain and dysfunction could prove to be harmful (Sorenson, 1989, Guyton and Hall, 2000).

Previous researchers have examined the relationship between changes in foot and ankle volume during daily activities and exercise (Chalk et al., 1995, Cloughley and Mawdsley, 1995, Moholkar and Fenelon, 2001). In their study involving nine volleyball players, Chalk et al. (1995) reported no changes in foot volume before and after workouts. Cloughley and Mawdsley (1995) examined 21 subjects during walking and running. They reported a change in foot and ankle volume with running as compared to walking using the Lucite foot volumeter measuring device. Foot and ankle volumes increased by an average of 17.9 ml during walking, while increasing 31.2 ml after running (p=0.02). However, they did not address if changes in volume occurred within the walking or running groups or how this related to shoe size.

Few studies have investigated the effects of running and walking on foot volumetrics (Stick et al., 1992, Cloughley and Mawdsley, 1995). In addition, only the paper by Chalk et al. (1995) has reported the relationship between shoe size and changes in foot volume before and after exercise.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between running and walking foot volumetrics, and its relationship between measured foot size and preferred shoe size. This research will serve as a pilot study for future research to investigate the relationship of exercise and oedema in the older athletic population and how exercise intensity and weight bearing status might influence these changes.

Section snippets

Subjects

The subjects consisted of 13 females and 15 male physical therapy student volunteers without a history of musculoskeletal injuries, health problems or surgery to the lower extremities. The age range was from 22 to 34 years with a mean of 27.1±3.7 years. Their self assessed individual activity levels ranged from sedentary to moderately active.

Instrumentation

All measurements were obtained using a lucite, foot volumeter set (Fig. 1) which included the volumeter container, an obturator which was used to calibrate

Design

All subjects were tested during walking and running and thus served as their own controls. The subjects were given a group instructional session at which time all aspects of the research study was explained and possible complications as a result of participation were discussed. During this session each subject read and signed an informed consent.

Exercise sessions

All subjects were required to rest in a supine position for 10 min prior to testing. The activity for the first condition (walking or running) was

Data analysis

Fluid volume data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical package for Windows®, release 10.0. Means and standard errors were calculated for the outcome variables. Given the normal distribution of data, paired t-tests were used to compare differences in outcome variables between pre and post-test means for both groups. The alpha level was set at 0.05.

Comparison of fluid volume changes during walking and running

Comparisons of pre and post data for walking and running groups are reported in Table 2. Significant mean increases in fluid volume were noted after walking (p=0.005) and after running (p=0.001). No difference was noted between the pre-walk and pre-run groups (p=0.484). A significant difference was noted between the groups in post-walk and post-run values (p=0.002).

Gender differences

When participants were divided by gender (Table 3), males showed significant changes in pre-run and post-run volumes (p=0.044) as

Discussion

The data from this study showed that, in healthy individuals, running and walking resulted in significant increases in foot and ankle fluid volumes compared to resting measurements. Additionally, when comparing running to walking, running demonstrated significantly greater changes than walking. These findings agree with other studies investigating the relationship between foot/ankle oedema and weight bearing activities (Sorenson, 1989, Stick et al., 1992, Chalk et al., 1995, Cloughley and

Conclusion

Results of this study indicate that treadmill jogging for 10 min can lead to significant increases in foot volume as compared to treadmill walking for the same amount of time in young healthy adults. Also, correct fit of athletic footwear is an important component in controlling increases in foot and ankle volume during exercise. Further investigations should look into the effects of these types of activities in the older athletic populations or those who have additional lower extremity

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the following students from the Department of Physical Therapy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas for their assistance in this research project: Blaine Archibald, Anne Beal, Allan Smith, Cheryl Cardillo, Wendy Hubbard, and Bernadette Romero.

References (26)

  • P Evanski

    The geriatric foot: disorders of the foot

    (1982)
  • G.M Gordon et al.

    Exercise and the ageing foot

    Southern Medical Journal

    (1994)
  • A.C Guyton et al.

    Textbook of medical physiology

    (2000)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text